Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus is just a bit better than the LG G Pro 2, getting a 79.7 score against 74.8. These phones come with Android OS, but the Motorola Moto G Stylus has the newer 11 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version, so it offers some nice extra features. The Motorola Moto G Stylus is a a lot newer phone than LG G Pro 2, but it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The LG G Pro 2 counts with a little better processing power than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less processing cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. LG G Pro 2 counts with a bit better looking display than Moto G Stylus, although it has a just a bit lower display density, a little smaller display and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution.
The Moto G Stylus captures greater photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus also has a lot more MP back camera, a lot bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low light situations and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. Moto G Stylus has better battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Moto G Stylus costs more than LG G Pro 2, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.