Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android |
| 2014-02-12 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 373 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is much better than the LG G Pro 2, having an 84.7 score against 74.8. Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system, and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 operating system. Galaxy A32's body is extremely newer, but heavier and a bit thicker than LG G Pro 2. LG G Pro 2 features an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density and a better 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A32 has much more memory to store more apps and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The LG G Pro 2 features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 4 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a camera with lot more MP and a much larger diafragm aperture. The Galaxy A32 features a superior battery duration than LG G Pro 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.