Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than LG G Pro 2, with a 91.8 score against 74.8. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G has the newer 11 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, so it gives a lot of extra features. The Galaxy A71 5G design is extremely newer and just a little bit thinner, but just a bit heavier than LG G Pro 2.
LG G Pro 2 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a little bit smaller display and a bit inferior amount of pixels per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a little faster CPU than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster) and 3 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A71 5G shoots a lot better videos and photos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a way better 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot larger aperture for better low-light captures.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory. The Galaxy A71 5G features a very superior battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 41% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G costs a lot more than LG G Pro 2, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.