Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than LG G Pro 2, with a 90.5 score against 74.8. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS, while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 OS. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a heavier cellphone than LG G Pro 2, but both of them are equally thin. The LG G Pro 2 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A90 5G, although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit superior processor than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G captures a lot better photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a lot bigger back camera sensor, a back camera with a way higher resolution and a larger camera aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy A90 5G features a much longer battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.