Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-02-12 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than LG G Pro 2, with a general score of 81 against 74.8. The Galaxy C9 Pro construction is a lot newer and thinner, but a little heavier than LG G Pro 2. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides a couple additional features.
The LG G Pro 2 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The LG G Pro 2 features a brighter screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1920 x 1080 resolution, the LG G Pro 2 also counts with a just a bit greater pixels quantity in each screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB and more internal memory capacity. The LG G Pro 2 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a worse 13 MP resolution and a much tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures, it also counts with a much higher video definition.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with improved battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.