Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is much better than the LG G Pro 2, getting a score of 83.3 against 74.8. Although Samsung Galaxy M30s is newer than the LG G Pro 2, it's a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M30s has the newer 11 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version, giving you a couple additional features.
LG G Pro 2 features a bit better looking display than Galaxy M30s, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a quite smaller screen and a quite lower display density. Galaxy M30s and LG G Pro 2 both feature really similar CPUs, because although the Galaxy M30s has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s captures way better photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also has a back facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution, a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited situations and a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Galaxy M30s has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy M30s has a much better battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.