Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31s is much better than the LG G Pro 2, getting a score of 88 against 74.8. Even though the Galaxy M31s is newer than LG G Pro 2, it's thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M31s has the newer 11 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version.
Samsung Galaxy M31s has a little faster processor than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and 4 more cpu cores. The LG G Pro 2 counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy M31s, although it has a bit smaller screen, a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy M31s takes much better pictures and videos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy M31s also has a much larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos, a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy M31s has a much better battery duration than LG G Pro 2, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.