Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than the LG G Pro 2, having a 77.8 score against 74.8. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is incredibly newer and way thinner than the LG G Pro 2's, but it's much heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, so it provides you a lot of extra features.
LG G Pro 2 has a really superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 13 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better display than LG G Pro 2, because it has a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a bit better display pixel density and a way bigger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher video quality, a much better resolution camera in the back and a lot larger aperture.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G Pro 2. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG G Pro 2, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.