Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is much better than LG G Pro 2's global score of 74.8. Even though Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is extremely newer than LG G Pro 2, it is just a little heavier and a little thicker. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with 4 more cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG G Pro 2 has just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, although it has a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, a little smaller display and a just a little lower display pixels density. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has 224 GB more internal storage and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a bit better camera than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much larger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has longer battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs a lot more money than the LG G Pro 2, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.