Compare phones
LG G2
AT&TD800
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | -- |
| 2013-08-07 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is slightly better than LG G2's overall score of 73.7. The Google Pixel body weights the same than the LG G2, but it is just a little thinner. LG G2 features a better display than Google Pixel, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, the LG G2 also counts with a little bigger screen.
LG G2 counts with a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the LG G2 also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Google Pixel counts with a bit better camera than LG G2, because although it has a less megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution, a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Google Pixel counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G2, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. LG G2 has just a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G2. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG G2, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.