Compare phones
LG G2
AT&TD800
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-08-07 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than the LG G2, with a 78.8 score against 73.7. The Google Pixel 3a is a way newer and a little thinner cellphone than the LG G2, although it is also a little bit heavier. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a has the older 11 version while LG G2 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The LG G2 counts with a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a quite smaller display. Google Pixel 3a has a much greater memory for games and applications than LG G2, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage capacity.
The LG G2 counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Google Pixel 3a has a slightly better camera than LG G2, because although it has a back facing camera with less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality pictures and videos and a much bigger aperture to take better low light photography.
The Google Pixel 3a features a battery performance that is just as good as LG G2's battery duration.
The Google Pixel 3a is more expensive than the LG G2, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.