Compare phones
LG G2
AT&TD800
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-08-07 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is a little bit better than LG G2, with a 78.9 score against 73.7. Even though Google Pixel 3a XL is somewhat heavier than LG G2, it's just a bit thinner and also newer. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 3a XL has the older 11 version while LG G2 has Android 4.4.2.
LG G2 has a brighter display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little higher pixels density. The LG G2 has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The Google Pixel 3a XL takes a little bit better photographs and videos than LG G2, because although it has a lesser mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger sensor shooting higher quality pictures and videos, a lot bigger camera aperture and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than LG G2, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with superior battery performance than LG G2, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Google Pixel 3a XL costs a little more money than the LG G2, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.