Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 10 |
| 2013-08-07 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue, Red and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 159.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K52 is slightly better than the LG G2, having a global score of 76 against 73.7. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the LG K52 has the older 10 version while LG G2 has Android 4.4.2 version. Even though LG K52 is incredibly heavier than LG G2, it's a bit thinner and also incredibly newer.
The LG G2 has a much more vibrant display than LG K52, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better 1920 x 1080px resolution and a lot more pixels per inch in the display. The LG K52 has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than LG G2, because it has 32 GB more internal storage.
The LG K52 has a processor that's just as good as the CPU in LG G2, because although the LG K52 has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and more cores. LG K52 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than LG G2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition, the LG K52 also has a lot larger sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality, a lot bigger aperture and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
LG K52 has longer battery life than LG G2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.