Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 10 |
| 2013-08-07 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 159.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is much better than LG G2's global score of 73.7. LG K92 is a noticeably newer and a little thinner cellphone than the LG G2, but it is notably heavier. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but LG K92 has an older 10 version and LG G2 has Android 4.4.2 version.
LG G2 features a better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The LG K92 has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than LG G2, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
LG G2 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG K92, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The LG K92 has superior battery life than LG G2, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
LG K92 shoots way better photos and videos than LG G2, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor, a lot bigger diafragm aperture and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G2. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG K92, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG G2, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.