Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 10 |
| 2013-08-07 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirror black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 159.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG Q70 has a score of 77.9, which is a little bit better than the LG G2's 73.7 global score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but LG Q70 has an older 10 version while LG G2 has Android 4.4.2 version. Even though LG Q70 is much heavier than the LG G2, it's a bit thinner and also notably newer.
The LG G2 features a more vivid display than LG Q70, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher screen pixel density. The LG Q70 has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than LG G2, because it has more internal storage capacity.
LG G2 features a little faster processing unit than LG Q70, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and less cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The LG Q70 has a superior camera than LG G2, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger sensor, a lot larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The LG Q70 counts with better battery lifetime than LG G2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although LG Q70 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G2. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy LG Q70, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG G2, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.