Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | -- |
| 2013-08-07 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than LG G2's general score of 73.7. The LG Velvet body is a lot newer and thinner than the LG G2's, although it is incredibly heavier. The LG Velvet features a bit more powerful processor than LG G2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM and a higher number of cores (and faster).
LG G2 counts with a better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. LG Velvet counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than LG G2, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
LG Velvet counts with a very superior camera than LG G2, because it has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a much bigger aperture for better images in poorly lited environments.
LG Velvet counts with a much better battery lifetime than LG G2, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
LG Velvet costs a lot more money than the LG G2, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.