Compare phones
LG G2
AT&TD800
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | -- |
| 2013-08-07 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a general score of 76.3, which is a little bit better than the LG G2's overall score of 73.7. Although the Motorola Moto Z3 Play is just a little heavier than the LG G2, it's thinner and noticeably newer. The LG G2 has a bit faster processor than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor.
The LG G2 features a brighter screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little better pixels amount in each inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play counts with just a bit better camera than LG G2, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality, a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a lot larger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Moto Z3 Play counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G2, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto Z3 Play has a battery life that is very similar to the LG G2 one.
Although Moto Z3 Play is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G2. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get LG G2, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.