Compare phones
LG G2
AT&TD800
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-08-07 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 159.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than LG G2, having a 79.8 score against 73.7. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola One Hyper has older 11 version and LG G2 has Android 4.4.2. The Motorola One Hyper design has the same thickness than LG G2, but it is a lot heavier.
The LG G2 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and less processing cores , it also counts with an extra GPU. The LG G2 counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels amount in each inch of display.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better camera than LG G2, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a back-facing camera with much more MP and a lot bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited situations. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G2, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola One Hyper has longer battery lifetime than LG G2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G2. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG G2, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.