Compare phones
LG G2
AT&TD800
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-08-07 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 159.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than the LG G2, getting a general score of 87 against 73.7. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version and LG G2 has Android 4.4.2 version. The Motorola razr (2020) body is much newer and somewhat thinner than LG G2's, although it is also way heavier.
Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better performance than LG G2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG G2 features a way better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher amount of pixels in each inch in the screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.
The Motorola razr (2020) shoots greater pictures and videos than LG G2, because it has a camera with a much higher resolution, a lot bigger diafragm aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much bigger sensor. Motorola razr (2020) features a very superior storage to install applications and games than LG G2, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The LG G2 has a bit longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG G2, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.