Compare phones
LG G2
AT&TD800
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 15 |
| 2013-08-07 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 159.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 424 pixels per inch | -- |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a global score of 79.2, which is slightly better than LG G2's 73.7 general score. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) design is newer and a lot thinner than LG G2's, although it is also way heavier. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has an older 15 version while LG G2 has Android 4.4.2.
LG G2 features a much sharper display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a really smaller display and much worse brightness. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than LG G2, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG G2 has a much better performing processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes greater photos and videos than LG G2, because it has a lot better video quality, a lot bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 50 MP resolution.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a really longer battery life than LG G2, because it has a 57 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.