Compare phones
LG G2
AT&TD800
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-08-07 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 159.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the LG G2, with a score of 97.6 against 73.7. The Galaxy Fold construction is a lot newer and incredibly thinner, but way heavier than LG G2. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while LG G2 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Galaxy Fold has just a bit better processing power than LG G2, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The LG G2 has a more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Fold captures much better photos and videos than LG G2, because although it has a worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution, a larger sensor which offers a better image and video quality and a much bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior memory for games and applications than LG G2, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Fold features a very superior battery lifetime than LG G2, because it has a 46% more battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G2. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG G2, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.