Compare phones
LG G2
AT&TD800
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2013-08-07 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 159.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than LG G2's 73.7 general score. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and LG G2 has Android 4.4.2. Even though the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is much newer than the LG G2, it is noticeably heavier and way thicker.
LG G2 counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080px resolution and a lot lower pixels amount per display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger display. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better performance than LG G2, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG G2 shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking worse quality videos and photographs and a way tinier aperture which is not good for capturing photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the LG G2 also counts with a back camera with a higher resolution.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than LG G2, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a very superior battery duration than LG G2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G2. If you want to save some money, you can get LG G2, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.