Compare phones
LG G2
AT&TD800
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-08-07 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than LG G2, with a score of 81 against 73.7. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version while LG G2 has Android 4.4.2. Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a lot newer than LG G2, it's notably heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a processor that's very similar to the LG G2 one, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and 4 more processing cores. The LG G2 features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel amount in each screen inch.
The Galaxy XCover Pro captures just a bit better videos and photos than LG G2, because although it has a way tinier back camera sensor capturing way lower quality photographs and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a much bigger aperture for better low-light captures and a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than LG G2, because it has 32 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a superior battery performance than LG G2, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G2. If you are trying to save some money, you can get LG G2, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.