Compare phones
LG G2
AT&TD800
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 11 |
| 2013-08-07 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 159.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 9.24 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than LG G2, having a general score of 85.6 against 73.7. Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a a lot newer and much thinner phone than the LG G2, although it is also way heavier. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the previous 11 version and LG G2 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The LG G2 counts with a better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a lot smaller display, a bit worse pixels amount per display inch and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a bit better hardware performance than LG G2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster) and more RAM memory.
LG G2 takes better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is worse for low light images, it also counts with a back camera with a higher 13 mega-pixels resolution. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than LG G2, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a bit better battery performance than LG G2, because it has a 10% more battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G2. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG G2, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.