Compare phones
LG G2
AT&TD800
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-08-07 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 159.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the LG G2, with a general score of 92.3 against 73.7. Although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much heavier than the LG G2, it's somewhat thinner and also much newer. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version while LG G2 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little better processing power than LG G2, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with 6 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores (and faster). The LG G2 has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a just a little worse pixels density, a much smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than LG G2, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG G2, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality, a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little longer battery life than LG G2, because it has a 10 percent larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way more expensive than the LG G2, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.