Compare phones
LG G2
AT&TD800
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 11 |
| 2013-08-07 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 159.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 9.24 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than LG G2, having a 90.6 score against 73.7. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is heavier than LG G2, it's much thinner and noticeably newer. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the previous 11 version and LG G2 has Android 4.4.2.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG G2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. LG G2 features a much better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way smaller screen and a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little bit higher screen pixel density.
LG G2 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with more MP. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much greater memory for applications and games than LG G2, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a superior battery life than LG G2, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.