Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-07-22 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the LG G3 Cat. 6, with an 83.7 score against 72.6. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is much newer and a little thinner than the LG G3 Cat. 6's, although it's also somewhat heavier. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and LG G3 Cat. 6 has Android 4.4.2.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG G3 Cat. 6, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG G3 Cat. 6 has a bit sharper screen than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a bit smaller screen, a bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a little worse number of pixels per display inch.
The LG V50 ThinQ shoots a lot better videos and photos than LG G3 Cat. 6, although it has a lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better storage for apps and games than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with superior battery life than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG V50 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.