Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-07-22 | 2020-03-05 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 has a global score of 86.5, which is better than the LG G3 Cat. 6's global score of 72.6. Both devices in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M31 has the previous 11 version and LG G3 Cat. 6 has Android 4.4.2. The Galaxy M31 construction is extremely newer and just a little thinner than LG G3 Cat. 6's, but it is also somewhat heavier.
LG G3 Cat. 6 counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M31, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 4 lesser processing cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. The LG G3 Cat. 6 features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel count per inch of screen and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 features a way better camera than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a back facing camera with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution. Galaxy M31 features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy M31 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.