Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-07-22 | 2018-08-24 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is better than LG G3 Cat. 6, getting a overall score of 87.1 against 72.6. The Galaxy Note9 construction is incredibly newer and just a little thinner than LG G3 Cat. 6's, although it's also a lot heavier. LG G3 Cat. 6 has a more vivid display than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixel density.
Galaxy Note9 has a bit superior processor than LG G3 Cat. 6, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy Note9 captures way better photos and videos than LG G3 Cat. 6, although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera in the back. The Galaxy Note9 has superior battery duration than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a lot more expensive than LG G3 Cat. 6, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.