Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-31 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the LG G5, with a overall score of 77.8 against 76.1. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a lot heavier than LG G5, it's much thinner and also notably newer.
The LG G5 features a really superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser processing cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better looking screen than LG G5, because although it has a lot lower pixel count per inch in the display, it also counts with a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a way larger screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a greater camera than LG G5, because it has a way bigger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality, a larger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments, a back camera with a much better resolution and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than LG G5, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than LG G5, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G5, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G5. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the LG G5, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.