Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2017-03-10 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 163.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is slightly better than LG G6, getting an 80.2 score against 75.6. Google Pixel's design is somewhat lighter but a bit thicker than the LG G6, and they were released with only a few months difference. LG G6 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel. They have a Quad-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM memory.
LG G6 features a little more vivid display than Google Pixel, because it has a better pixel amount in each inch of display, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a little bit larger display. The LG G6 counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel captures just a bit better videos and photos than LG G6, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, it also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs.
The LG G6 counts with longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G6. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel, else you can save some money and get the LG G6, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.