Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2017-03-10 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 163.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than the LG G6, with an 81.9 score against 75.6. The Google Pixel 4 design is extremely newer and a little lighter than LG G6's, but it is just a little thicker. Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better performance than LG G6, because it has more processing cores and more RAM.
The LG G6 has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG G6 also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a better pixel density. The LG G6 counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than LG G6, because although it has a lower 12.2 MP resolution back camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
LG G6 has improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G6. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the LG G6, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.