Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2017-03-10 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 163.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than LG G6, getting an 81.3 score against 75.6. The LG V35 ThinQ is a newer device, and it's also just a little thinner and just a bit lighter than LG G6. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a display that is just as good as the display in LG G6, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a just a little inferior pixel amount per inch of screen, and they both have exactly the same 1440 x 2880 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little better hardware performance than LG G6, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and they are faster). The LG V35 ThinQ captures a bit better videos and photos than LG G6, because although it has a tinier sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a more mega pixels back camera and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bigger memory to store more games and applications than LG G6, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 64 GB internal storage. LG V35 ThinQ features a battery lifetime that's just as good as the LG G6 one.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG G6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G6. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG G6, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.