Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2017-03-10 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 163.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is better than LG G6's 75.6 global score. LG Velvet is a just a bit heavier cellphone than LG G6, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The LG Velvet has a little better hardware performance than LG G6, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
LG G6 features a little more vivid screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a greater display density. The LG Velvet features a superior camera than LG G6, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the LG Velvet also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
The LG Velvet features a very superior memory for apps and games than LG G6, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 96 GB more internal storage. LG Velvet features greater battery duration than LG G6, because it has a 30% greater battery capacity.
LG Velvet is way more expensive than the LG G6, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.