Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-03-10 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 163.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force has a global score of 75.8, which is a bit better than the LG G6's 75.6 general score. Moto Z Force is a a little bit thinner cellphone than LG G6, but both of them weight 5.75oz. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Moto Z Force has 7.0 Nougat version and LG G6 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Moto Z Force has a processor that is just as good as LG G6's CPU, they have a 4 GB RAM memory and 4 processing cores. The LG G6 features a bit better display than Moto Z Force, because it has a bit bigger display, a little higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Moto Z Force captures just a bit better pictures and videos than LG G6, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a same size aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto Z Force also has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution. The Moto Z Force has more storage for applications and games than LG G6, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB, the Moto Z Force also has 32 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit superior battery duration than LG G6, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Motorola Moto Z Force is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G6. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z Force, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG G6, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.