Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-10 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 163.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is just a bit better than the LG G6, with a 79.8 score against 75.6. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but Motorola One Hyper has 11 version while LG G6 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola One Hyper's body is much newer than LG G6's, but it is somewhat thicker and heavier.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG G6, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Hyper also has 4 more CPU cores. LG G6 counts with a bit better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G6, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better camera than LG G6, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way better 64 MP resolution camera in the back.
Motorola One Hyper has superior battery lifetime than LG G6, because it has a 21% greater battery size.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G6. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG G6, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.