Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-03-10 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 163.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a global score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than the LG G6's 75.6 global score. Nubia Red Magic 3S's body is extremely newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than LG G6. These phones include the same Android 9.0 Pie operating system. LG G6 counts with a little bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than LG G6, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit faster processor than LG G6, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a superior battery performance than LG G6, because it has a 52% bigger battery capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S takes a lot better photos and videos than LG G6, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a camera with way more mega-pixels, a way bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G6. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 3S, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG G6, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.