Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-10 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 163.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is better than LG G6, getting an 85.5 score against 75.6. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version while LG G6 has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy A51 is a just a little heavier cellphone than the LG G6, but both of them have the same thickness.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG G6, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a higher number of cores (but slower). The LG G6 features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The Galaxy A51 has a better camera than LG G6, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a better storage capacity for applications and games than LG G6, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A51 has improved battery performance than LG G6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 costs a lot more money than LG G6, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.