Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-10 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 163.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is way better than the LG G6's 75.6 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version and LG G6 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A51 5G's construction is much newer, but somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than the LG G6.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG G6, because it has more RAM and 4 more CPU cores. LG G6 has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a better display pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than LG G6, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a very superior storage for games and applications than LG G6, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features greater battery life than LG G6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G costs a lot more than LG G6, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.