Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2017-03-10 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 163.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the LG G6, getting a score of 92.9 against 75.6. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version while LG G6 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is noticeably newer, but somewhat heavier and a little thicker than LG G6.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit better performance than LG G6, because it has 4 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM. LG G6 features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a higher amount of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A71 5G UW takes a lot better photographs and videos than LG G6, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a lot larger sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G6, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features longer battery performance than LG G6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG G6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G6. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG G6, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.