Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-03-10 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 163.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is way better than the LG G6, getting a overall score of 97.6 against 75.6. Although the Galaxy Fold is incredibly heavier than LG G6, it's somewhat thinner and noticeably newer. Both of these devices include the same Android 9.0 Pie OS. LG G6 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better screen pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
Galaxy Fold features much more memory to store more apps and games than LG G6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit more powerful CPU than LG G6, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit better camera than LG G6, because although it has a worse video quality and a camera in the back with less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs and a larger aperture for better captures in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy Fold has superior battery lifetime than LG G6, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G6. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG G6, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.