Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2017-03-10 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 163.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is much better than LG G6, getting an 86.3 score against 75.6. The Galaxy S10e body has the same thickness than LG G6, but it is a bit lighter. The LG G6 features a little bit better display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a higher screen pixels density.
Galaxy S10e has a better memory to install applications and games than LG G6, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S10e features a little bit better performance than LG G6, because it has 4 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM.
LG G6 has just a little better battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 6 percent bigger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S10e captures a little bit better pictures and videos than LG G6, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse 12 MP resolution and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger sensor which provides a better image and video quality and a bigger aperture for better low-light captures.
Although Samsung Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G6. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S10e, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG G6, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.