Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-10 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 163.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is way better than the LG G6, with a 94.8 score against 75.6. Samsung Galaxy S20 is a a little heavier phone than LG G6, but both of them have the same thickness. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version and LG G6 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy S20 has a little faster processor than LG G6, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (and they are faster). The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a slightly better looking screen than LG G6, because it has a bit larger screen, a just a bit greater pixel number in each inch of display and a little bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than LG G6, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S20 has longer battery lifetime than LG G6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 shoots much better pictures and videos than LG G6, because although it has a lesser mega pixels camera in the back, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G6. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy LG G6, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.