Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2017-03-10 | -- |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Black and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 163.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is a bit better than LG G6's 75.6 general score. The Galaxy S25 is a incredibly thinner and extremely lighter cellphone than LG G6. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version while LG G6 has Android 9.0 Pie. LG G6 counts with a much better performing CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and 4 GB less RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a more vivid display than LG G6, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a way lower display density, it also counts with a bit larger display. The LG G6 features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S25, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with longer battery performance than LG G6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S25 captures a lot better photographs and videos than LG G6, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a camera in the back with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much bigger camera sensor.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G6. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy LG G6, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.