Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-03-10 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 163.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 565 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the LG G6's 75.6 overall score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the previous 8.0 Oreo version and LG G6 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is way newer, but notably heavier and way thicker than the LG G6.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more vivid screen than LG G6, because although it has a quite lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G6, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has more processing cores.
LG G6 takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and videos in low-light environments and a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back facing camera with a higher resolution.
The LG G6 counts with a little bit better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with greater battery life than LG G6, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G6. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get LG G6, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.