Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-10 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 163.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than LG G6's 75.6 general score. The Galaxy XCover Pro is a a lot newer device than LG G6, although it is a lot heavier and incredibly thicker. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version while LG G6 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG G6 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880. The LG G6 counts with a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little better processing power than LG G6, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has more processing cores. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a little bit better camera than LG G6, because although it has a way smaller camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels camera and a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features superior battery lifetime than LG G6, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G6. If you want to save some dollars, you can get LG G6, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.