Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-10 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 163.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the LG G6, getting a general score of 94.6 against 75.6. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but extremely heavier than the LG G6. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version and LG G6 has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG G6 features a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher screen density and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more powerful processor than LG G6, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better camera than LG G6, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a less MP back-facing camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a way bigger sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG G6, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has superior battery life than LG G6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get LG G6, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.