Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a general score of 80.3, which is slightly better than LG G7 Fit's score of 77. Although the Google Nexus 6P is older and somewhat heavier than the LG G7 Fit, it's body is still just a little bit thinner. The Google Nexus 6P has a bit superior CPU than LG G7 Fit, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (although they are slower).
LG G7 Fit counts with a sharper display than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a bit larger display, a little bit higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a quite better pixels quantity per inch of display. LG G7 Fit features a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Google Nexus 6P features just a bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a lower video quality and a lot lower 12.3 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures.
Google Nexus 6P counts with just a bit longer battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 15 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.