Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than the LG G7 Fit, having a global score of 81.6 against 77. The Google Pixel 2 is a a little lighter phone than the LG G7 Fit, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The LG G7 Fit counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a bigger display and a greater count of pixels per inch of screen.
The LG G7 Fit has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 2 has just a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Google Pixel 2 also has a larger number of cores.
The LG G7 Fit has just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity. Google Pixel 2's camera is very similar to the LG G7 Fit one, because although the Google Pixel 2 has a back-facing camera with a lot lower 12.2 megapixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger sensor providing a better image quality and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.