Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is slightly better than LG G7 Fit's overall score of 77. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The LG V50 ThinQ is an a little thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the LG G7 Fit.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a brighter screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 3120px, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more internal storage capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a much worse resolution back-facing camera and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a lot larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos.
The LG V50 ThinQ has better battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.